cursor-bridge — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Vanyangyang · MCP Server · ★ 78

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is cursor-bridge safe to install? View the security audit →

About cursor-bridge

If you use this, star the repo. Compatibility: I only keep Cursor Bridge working against the latest Cursor. Older Cursor versions are not something I actively support. If you need a historical Cursor, open the compatibility and update history and switch to the archived Bridge release listed for that Cursor, if one exists. Archived releases get no further fixes. If nothing there fits, use Fork in the top-right corner and keep the adaptation in your own fork. Cursor Bridge + Grok Build Supervisor 简体中文 · Changelog · AI install · Releases · Issues [](https://github.com/Vanyangyang/cursor-

claude-codecodexcoding-agentcursorcursor-idedeveloper-toolsgrok-buildmcpmodel-context-protocolpi

Quick Facts

Stars78
Forks10
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score62.8532470179338/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2025-07-18
Platformsclaude-code, codex, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~20k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with cursor-bridge for enhanced workflows:

  • grok-build-vscode — semantic(0.70)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (69%)
  • grokbuild-proxy — semantic(0.59)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)
  • linkcode — semantic(0.57)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (64%)

cursor-bridge alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a cursor-bridge alternative? If you're comparing cursor-bridge with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • omega-memory by omega-memory · ⭐ 219

    Persistent memory for AI coding agents

  • kasetto by pivoshenko · ⭐ 207

    📼 Declarative AI agent environment manager, written in Rust

  • mcp-fusion by vinkius-labs · ⭐ 204

    MCP Fusion - The framework for AI-native MCP servers.

  • palot by ItsWendell · ⭐ 190

    Just another desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes

  • vibepod-cli by VibePod · ⭐ 175

    Unified CLI for running AI coding agents in isolated containers. Includes built-in local metrics collection, H

  • toolhive-studio by stacklok · ⭐ 169

    ToolHive is an application that allows you to install, manage and run MCP servers and connect them to AI agent

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is cursor-bridge?

cursor-bridge is Use Cursor CCE and bounded Cursor Agent execution from Codex, Claude Code, Grok Build, or Pi, with an independent Grok Build Supervisor.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 78 GitHub stars.

What programming language is cursor-bridge written in?

cursor-bridge is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as claude-code, codex, coding-agent.

How do I install or use cursor-bridge?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the cursor-bridge GitHub repository at github.com/Vanyangyang/cursor-bridge. The project has 78 stars and 10 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does cursor-bridge use?

cursor-bridge is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to cursor-bridge?

The top alternatives to cursor-bridge on Agent Skills Hub include omega-memory, kasetto, mcp-fusion. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools