by VoDaiLocz · Agent Tool · ★ 11
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 11 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-04 |
| Created | 2026-03-04 |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Full-spectrum design patterns skill: Detect anti-patterns, diagnose architectural debt, generate production-ready refactored code. GoF, SOLID, DDD, CQRS, Microservices.
Looking for a Design-Patterns alternative? If you're comparing Design-Patterns with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
27 AI-ready skills for generating production-grade .NET code — Clean Architecture, CQRS, DDD. Works with Claud
Robust skills for Agents
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
Code intelligence for AI assistants - MCP server, CLI, and HTTP API with symbol navigation, impact analysis, a
A Context Compiler for TypeScript. Deterministic, diffable architectural contracts and dependency graphs for A
Answer "what breaks if I change this?" Reverse dependency analysis, cycle detection, and token-budgeted contex
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: