by WecoAI · Agent Tool · ★ 1.1k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,075 |
| Forks | 81 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | CC0-1.0 |
| Quality Score | 56/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-30 |
| Created | 2026-03-22 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Awesome AutoResearch A curated list of AutoResearch use cases with optimization traces and open source implementations. Every entry includes a link to the actual optimization trajectory so you can see what the agent tried, not just the final result. What is AutoResearch? AutoResearch is, at its core, a prompt.
Looking for a awesome-autoresearch alternative? If you're comparing awesome-autoresearch with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A copy-paste system prompt that has your coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) build a self-improving agen
turns your codebase into an autoresearch loop — discovers what to measure, instruments the benchmark, then run
🦞+🔬 NanoResearch: The Autonomous AI Research Assistant
A database of SDKs, frameworks, libraries, and tools for creating, monitoring, debugging and deploying autonom
Semi-Structured Agentic Framework. Workflows build themselves as agents discover what needs to be done, not wh
Autonomous software engineering fleet of AI agents for production-grade PRs on AgentField: plan, code, test, a
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: