by WenXiaoWendy · MCP Server · ★ 1.3k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/WenXiaoWendy/cyberboss.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,265 |
| Forks | 132 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 25 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-08 |
| Created | 2026-04-06 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~145k |
中文 · English The Overbearing Boss Fell for My ADHD Cyberboss: a WeChat bridge for Codex and Claude Code "Keep escaping into dopamine if you want. I'll still catch you at the next timestamp." User Guide · Agent Guide · Local Data · FAQ Cyberboss is not another polite productivity timer. It is not a to-do list with better branding either.
These tools work well together with cyberboss for enhanced workflows:
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: