by XSafeAI · Codex Skill · ★ 148
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Introducing XSafeClaw: The Open-Source Agent Safety Platform from Fudan University
| Stars | 148 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 39.05/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-02 |
| Created | 2026-03-10 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~20903k |
Looking for a XSafeClaw alternative? If you're comparing XSafeClaw with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A comprehensive reference for securing Large Language Models (LLMs). Covers OWASP GenAI Top-10 risks, prompt i
AI Agent Security Middleware — 8-layer defense, DLP data flow, prompt injection detection, zero dependencies.
SecureClaw - Security Plugin and Skill for OpenClaw OWASP-Aligned
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha
Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha
Security proxy for AI agents. Scans every message for prompt injection, PII, and secrets. Defense-in-depth: Go
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
XSafeClaw is Introducing XSafeClaw: The Open-Source Agent Safety Platform from Fudan University. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 148 GitHub stars.
XSafeClaw is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-safety, agentic-ai, ai-safety.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the XSafeClaw GitHub repository at github.com/XSafeAI/XSafeClaw. The project has 148 stars and 6 forks, indicating an active community.
XSafeClaw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to XSafeClaw on Agent Skills Hub include LLMSecurityGuide, shellward, secureclaw. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.