XSafeClaw — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by XSafeAI · Codex Skill · ★ 160

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is XSafeClaw safe to install? View the security audit →

About XSafeClaw

English · 中文文档 XSafeClaw: Monitor and Secure Your Agents 🚀 🔥🔥 Now supporting OpenClaw, Hermes, and Nanobot! 🔥🔥 AI agents are not just new software. They are software that can be talked into doing dangerous things. As agents move from chatbots to active systems that browse the web, execute code, and operate inside real workflows, we have handed language models the keys to our infrastructure before figuring out how to keep them on the rails. This breaks traditional security assumptions entirely. In conventional systems, behavior is defined in code. In agents, behavior emerges at runtime from instructions, retrieved content, memory, and long decision loops. An attacker no longer needs to exploit a bug. They can manipulate the agent's reasoning, redirect its trajectory, or turn small permissions into larger ones over time. Prompt injection

agent-safetyagentic-aiai-safetyllm-securityopenclawprompt-injectionred-teamingsafe-claw

Quick Facts

Stars160
Forks8
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score63.5439690760299/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-07-10
Created2026-03-10
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~17k

XSafeClaw alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a XSafeClaw alternative? If you're comparing XSafeClaw with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Sponsio by SponsioLabs · ⭐ 441

    Deterministic safety solutions for probabilistic AI agents

  • LLMSecurityGuide by requie · ⭐ 135

    A comprehensive reference for securing Large Language Models (LLMs). Covers OWASP GenAI Top-10 risks, prompt i

  • openclaw-skills-security by UseAI-pro · ⭐ 70

    Curated, security-first OpenClaw skills (Markdown-based). Security audit skills - detect prompt injection, sup

  • agentseal by getagentseal · ⭐ 374

    Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha

  • agentseal by AgentSeal · ⭐ 156

    Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha

  • awesome-agent-skills-security by LLMSecurity · ⭐ 101

    🛡️ A curated list of resources on agent skills security: attacks, defenses, frameworks, and benchmarks for se

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is XSafeClaw?

XSafeClaw is Introducing XSafeClaw: The Open-Source Agent Safety Platform from Fudan University. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 160 GitHub stars.

What programming language is XSafeClaw written in?

XSafeClaw is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-safety, agentic-ai, ai-safety.

How do I install or use XSafeClaw?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the XSafeClaw GitHub repository at github.com/XSafeAI/XSafeClaw. The project has 160 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does XSafeClaw use?

XSafeClaw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to XSafeClaw?

The top alternatives to XSafeClaw on Agent Skills Hub include Sponsio, LLMSecurityGuide, openclaw-skills-security. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools