by Xia-Ataraxia · LLM Plugin · ★ 58
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 58 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 75/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-08 |
| Created | 2024-09-04 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Metadata Auto Classifier AI-powered Obsidian plugin that analyzes your notes and generates tags and frontmatter values with a configurable AI provider. The more context you give, the more accurate the classification.
Looking for a obsidian-metadata-auto-classifier alternative? If you're comparing obsidian-metadata-auto-classifier with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that implements the Zettelkasten knowledge management methodology, allow
Simplify tagging in Obsidian. Instantly analyze and tag your document with one click for efficient note organi
MCP server for Claude Code/VSCode/Cursor/Windsurf to use editor self functionality. ⚡ Get real-time LSP diagno
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Obsidian vault intelligence
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: