by YTruman · Agent Tool · ★ 212
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/YTruman/better-skill.git <你的技能目录>/better-skillTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 212 |
| Forks | 18 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2026-10-27 |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
better-skill AI Agent 技能的医生手册。 一套有证据支撑的标准：选型、体检、打分、建造——萃取自对官方 300+ 技能的全量审计。 🇺🇸 English | 🇨🇳 中文 你的 Agent 技能越多，越需要一个医生。 大多数技能仓库教你怎么写技能；这一份管的是标准：动工前该选哪种架构、一个健康技能内部长什么样、以及怎么用数字证明一个技能比另一个好。 为什么需要它 Skill 可能做了几十个，但从来没有认真体检过一个。 三个你大概熟悉的场景： 技能写完就用，从没体检过。 描述膨胀、方法内嵌正文、示例缺失——都是慢性病，发作的时候你只觉得"这技能不好用"，但说不出哪里坏。 触发是玄学。 该触发的时候不触发，不该触发的时候乱触发。几乎没人真的测过触发率——本标准把"描述触发"变成可以量化、可以迭代优化的工程问题。 "我的技能比你的好"——没有统一标尺的对比就是吵架。...
Looking for a better-skill alternative? If you're comparing better-skill with other agent tool tools, these 5 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A collection of standardized Agent Skills to teach GitHub Copilot, Claude, Gemini and Cursor about modern Andr
A collection of Agent skills and Claude Code plugins for HashiCorp products.
Coding Agents skills for Synalinks OSS
Claude Code Skill Factory — A powerful open-source toolkit for building and deploying production-ready Claude
Lightweight registry to discover, install, and manage all public Claude plugins and agent skills for your favo
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: