alphaevo — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by ZhuLinsen · Codex Skill · ★ 176

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is alphaevo safe to install? View the security audit →

About alphaevo

🧬 AlphaEvo An Open-Source Self-Evolving Stock Strategy Research Agent Watch strategies get diagnosed, mutated, re-tested, and pruned like research assets Overview · Core Capabilities · Quick Start · Architecture · Validation · CLI English | 中文 ✨ Overview AlphaEvo is a self-evolving stock strategy research agent. It turns a readable YAML strategy into a research loop: backtest, diagnose failure, propose a controlled mutation, re-test the new version, and keep the full evidence trail.

agentevolutionfinancefintechllmopenclawpythonquantstock

Quick Facts

Stars176
Forks71
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score63.1882971871734/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-07-03
Created2026-03-31
Platformsdocker, python
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with alphaevo for enhanced workflows:

  • joinquant-skill — semantic(0.30)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (64%)
  • maverick-mcp — semantic(0.25)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (63%)
  • futu-stock-mcp-server — semantic(0.33)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)

alphaevo alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a alphaevo alternative? If you're comparing alphaevo with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • TradingAgents-AShare by KylinMountain · ⭐ 834

    A 股多智能体智能投研系统 — 基于 TradingAgents 架构,15 名 AI Agent 模拟机构协作与实时辩论对抗,全流程可视化,支持 OpenClaw / Claude Code 集成,Docker 一键部

  • TradingAgents-MCPmode by guangxiangdebizi · ⭐ 337

    TradingAgents-MCPmode 是一个创新的多智能体交易分析系统,集成了 Model Context Protocol (MCP) 工具,实现了智能化的股票分析和交易决策流程。系统通过多个专业化智能体的协作,

  • hhxg-top-hhxg-python by Niceck · ⭐ 73

    skills:一句话获取 A 股每日市场数据 — 赚钱效应、热门题材、连板天梯、游资龙虎榜。零配置,无需注册,无需 Token。

  • OpenAshare by ZhiweiChen-coder · ⭐ 68

    🤖 A 股与港股 AI 研究智能体:行情、技术分析、新闻热点、交易信号、持仓管理与 Agent 问答一站式完成。

  • maverick-mcp by wshobson · ⭐ 678

    MaverickMCP - Personal Stock Analysis MCP Server

  • mcp-trader by wshobson · ⭐ 273

    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for stock traders

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is alphaevo?

alphaevo is An Self-Evolving Stock Strategy Research Agent 策略回测和自我进化. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 176 GitHub stars.

What programming language is alphaevo written in?

alphaevo is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent, evolution, finance.

How do I install or use alphaevo?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the alphaevo GitHub repository at github.com/ZhuLinsen/alphaevo. The project has 176 stars and 71 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does alphaevo use?

alphaevo is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to alphaevo?

The top alternatives to alphaevo on Agent Skills Hub include TradingAgents-AShare, TradingAgents-MCPmode, hhxg-top-hhxg-python. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools