by aduermael · Agent Tool · ★ 66
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 66 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Swift |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 52/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-08 |
| Created | 2026-06-20 |
| Platforms | browser, cli |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
wb is a macOS 26+ web browser for agents, exposed as a lightweight command-line tool. It gives scripts and coding agents a real persistent browser session without a bundled Chromium, driver server, or heavyweight app wrapper.
Looking for a wb alternative? If you're comparing wb with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A modern browser for macOS. Agentic, local-first, native Swift, Chromium powered
Static analysis tool that catches 1000+ bug patterns across all popular programming languages, with auto-wirin
Let Claude Code and other coding agents drive and debug Chrome from the shell. DOM, network, console and raw C
Personal Assistant Wizard for Claude Code — npx pawmode
MCP server for computer use & browser automation - screenshot, OCR, click, type, find_text, Chrome/Electron C
Open-source Arc alternative for macOS: a Chromium browser for developers with Spaces, a dev command bar and a
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: