by ahoybuoy · Agent Tool · ★ 20
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 20 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 76/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-24 |
| Created | 2025-12-28 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Design system guardian for code. Anchors to design system, catches drift in React/Vue/Tailwind, reviews PRs automatically. Free for open source.
Looking for a buoy alternative? If you're comparing buoy with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Inspect, build, or extend Figma design systems from Claude Code. Read-only audits with WCAG checks and compone
Local Figma MCP server with no REST rate limits, no metered tool-call quotas, and a verification loop. Drop-in
A Claude skill that audits designs against 19 professional design rules.
On-demand design systems from any URL. Five surfaces, one agent: web, API, CLI, TypeScript SDK, and a portable
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
Design system skills for agentic tools
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: