by airlock-hq · Codex Skill · ★ 86
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 86 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-09 |
| Created | 2026-02-24 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~936k |
Airlock [!WARNING] This project is deprecated. Development has moved to kunchenguid/no-mistakes. Please use that repository instead. This repo is no longer actively maintained. []() All slop must die. Airlock is where every git push turns into a slop-free PR.
Looking for a airlock alternative? If you're comparing airlock with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Kindly Web Search MCP Server: Web search + robust content retrieval for AI coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, C
Manage MCP servers, skills and plugins across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and more. Built-in marketplace, one-c
DeepContext is an MCP server that adds symbol-aware semantic search to Claude Code, Codex CLI, and other agent
The rules layer for AI-written code — rig-lite: a fail-closed cross-model review gate, a written constitution,
codex cli hooks - adding voice on each hook
Multi-agent codebase review for PRs, CI, and downstream fork syncs.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: