by alchaincyf · AI Tool · ★ 119
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
huashu-weread 「不是查数据。是 AI 把你忘掉的那些时刻还给你。」 微信读书高阶顾问 · 在官方 weread skill 之上加一层「读书顾问的工作流」 微信读书前几天上了一个官方 AI skill（weread.qq.com/r/weread-skills），把书架、笔记、阅读统计、推荐 6 件事开放给 AI。能力很强，但它只是「自然语言包装的搜索接口」——你让它推荐书，它不会去看你已经读过什么，常把你笔记 68 条的书又当新书推回来给你。 本 skill 在官方 8 个 API 之上，加一层「读书顾问的工作流」。核心方法是「书架 + 笔记交叉分析」——书架揭示你「主动归类的兴趣」，笔记揭示你「真读过的书」。只看书架会漏信号，只看笔记会错过兴趣方向。 跨 agent 通用——Claude Code、Cursor、Codex、OpenClaw、Hermes 都能装。 看效果对比 · 装上就能用 · 4 个 workflow · 核心方法 看效果对比 同样一个问题：「推荐下产品经理方向的书」。 裸 weread skill 答：14 本通识书单 按入门到进阶分了 6 个梯队，推《俞军产品方法论》《幕后产品》《硅谷增长黑客实战笔记》……都是好书，但： 《俞军产品方法论》我做了 68 条笔记 《幕后产品》在我书架上躺着两年 《硅谷增长黑客》我做了 34 条笔记 它根本没看我的笔记和书架，只是一个用自然语言包装的搜索接口。把读过的书又当新书推回来。 huashu-weread 答：5 本针对你的拼图建议 最后还给「如果只读一本：X」和「如果想真正再上一个台阶：Y+Z」两个明确建议。 差距：
| Stars | 119 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 57.5356122860246/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-17 |
| Created | 2026-05-17 |
| Est. Tokens | ~4k |
Looking for a huashu-weread alternative? If you're comparing huashu-weread with other ai tool tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
huashu-weread is 微信读书高阶顾问 · 在官方 weread skill 之上加一层「读书顾问的工作流」· 书架+笔记交叉分析 · 4 个 workflow (advisor/path/alchemy/review) · Made by 花叔. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 119 GitHub stars.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the huashu-weread GitHub repository at github.com/alchaincyf/huashu-weread. The project has 119 stars and 5 forks, indicating an active community.
huashu-weread is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to huashu-weread on Agent Skills Hub include redesigned-pancake, maui-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.