image-to-editable-pptx: what it is & alternatives

by algerchen2024 · Agent Tool · ★ 10

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is image-to-editable-pptx safe to install? View the security audit →

About image-to-editable-pptx

ChatGPT Skill + portable PageIR/PptxGenJS workflow for rebuilding flattened slide images into source-faithful editable PowerPoint files.

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

Quick Facts

Stars10
Forks5
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score65.6690218006873/100
Open Issues7
Last Updated2026-10-10
Created2026-08-09
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~15k

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is image-to-editable-pptx?

image-to-editable-pptx is ChatGPT Skill + portable PageIR/PptxGenJS workflow for rebuilding flattened slide images into source-faithful editable PowerPoint files.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 10 GitHub stars.

What programming language is image-to-editable-pptx written in?

image-to-editable-pptx is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use image-to-editable-pptx?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the image-to-editable-pptx GitHub repository at github.com/algerchen2024/image-to-editable-pptx. The project has 10 stars and 5 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does image-to-editable-pptx use?

image-to-editable-pptx is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools