paper2pr: what it is & alternatives

by alohays · Agent Tool · ★ 6

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is paper2pr safe to install? View the security audit →

About paper2pr

AI/ML Paper → Presentation-ready Beamer + Quarto slides via Claude Code multi-agent workflow

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

ai-mlbeamerclaude-codepaper-reviewquarto

Quick Facts

Stars6
Forks1
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64.4235580931697/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2026-03-15
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~14k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with paper2pr for enhanced workflows:

  • agent-skills — semantic(0.21)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (52%)

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is paper2pr?

paper2pr is AI/ML Paper → Presentation-ready Beamer + Quarto slides via Claude Code multi-agent workflow. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 6 GitHub stars.

What programming language is paper2pr written in?

paper2pr is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-ml, beamer, claude-code.

How do I install or use paper2pr?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the paper2pr GitHub repository at github.com/alohays/paper2pr. The project has 6 stars and 1 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does paper2pr use?

paper2pr is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools