by ankit-aglawe · AI Tool · ★ 27
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 27 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-01 |
| Created | 2026-09-22 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
A tiny jev-like model that answers Choice, Score and Noul questions in one forward pass and returns calibrated probabilities. MLX or PyTorch, fully offline, System One compatible.
These tools work well together with tinyjev for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a tinyjev alternative? If you're comparing tinyjev with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Typed-decision models (noul / choice / score) trained by a self-improving loop of AI agents — checkpoints, the
TypeSafe Jev for DeepSeek Harness, the Model Context Protocol, and plain Node: typed judgments instead of pros
Local proxy that learns your app's typed LLM decisions and answers them with a Laya head. Jev and OpenAI compa
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
Open infrastructure for training, evaluating, and deploying System 1 decision models across language and multi
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: