by aowang-ai · AI Tool · ★ 221
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 221 |
| Forks | 43 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-21 |
| Created | 2026-09-17 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
jev-trade Live demo: jev-trade.com Jev reads Hyperliquid every tick. Five isolated sleeves (BTC, ETH, SOL, DOGE, BNB). Each sleeve has its own wallet and Jev call. Every tick Jev picks long or short, then open, close, or hold. An entry is a post-only Alo quote one tick inside the touch, so it earns the maker side and fills when a taker hits it.
Looking for a jev-trade alternative? If you're comparing jev-trade with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated list of awesome Jev / TypeSafe System One applications, libraries, and resources.
A curated list of official resources and community projects for TypeSafe, System One models, and Jev.
A lightweight, modular Java application framework for web and CLI development, designed for AI integra
Per-turn model & reasoning routing for Codex, driven by Jev (TypeSafe System One): picks the model, thinking d
A community directory of projects built on Jev, TypeSafe AI's System One model.
TypeSafe Jev as a decision layer for the Pi coding agent: a measured tool-call gate plus jev_ask for typed, ca
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: