by apple-ouyang · Agent Tool · ★ 138
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/apple-ouyang/book-to-skill.git
Taken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 138 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-25 |
| Created | 2026-02-25 |
| Est. Tokens | ~6k |
📚 book-to-skill 把书拆成 AI Agent 可执行的 Skill,让书中的智慧变成你的决策副驾驶 快速安装 · English · 已有 Skills · 书单认领 · 贡献指南 为什么需要 book-to-skill? 我们读过很多好书,但在真正需要做决定的时候,书里的方法论往往想不起来。 你可能读过《行为设计学》里的 WRAP 框架,但面对"要不要辞职创业"时,你还记得"消失选项测试"怎么用吗? book-to-skill 解决这个问题: 把书籍中的框架、案例和操作步骤,拆解成 Claude Code 的 Skill 格式。当你面临决策时,AI Agent 会自动调用对应的思维框架,一步步引导你分析——而不是给你一个模糊的建议。 Agent 会自动走 WRAP 流程:拓宽选择 → 验证假设 → 留出距离 → 准备出错,每一步都有真实案例辅助理解。 ⭐ Star...
These tools work well together with book-to-skill for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a book-to-skill alternative? If you're comparing book-to-skill with other agent tool tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Lightweight registry to discover, install, and manage all public Claude plugins and agent skills for your favo
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: