codex-control-plane-mcp — security grade SAFE, quality 69/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 69/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by aresyn · MCP Server · ★ 122

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is codex-control-plane-mcp safe to install? View the security audit →

About codex-control-plane-mcp

Codex Control Plane MCP English | Русский Reliable Codex Desktop automation for long tasks. turns Codex Desktop and into a durable worker that an MCP client can drive safely. Send a task, get an or right away, poll until the work finishes, approve Plan Mode when needed, then read the final report. The server handles the awkward parts that thin wrappers usually leave to the caller: app-server startup, thread and turn creation, retry safety, duplicate prompt protectio

agent-toolsagentic-workflowsai-agentsautomationcodexcodex-desktopdeveloper-toolshermeshermes-agentlong-running-tasks

Quick Facts

Stars122
Forks4
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score69.2366996454525/100
Open Issues7
Last Updated2026-09-09
Created2026-06-17
Platformscodex, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with codex-control-plane-mcp for enhanced workflows:

  • Codex-Mate — semantic(0.28)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • alpha-insights — semantic(0.19)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)

codex-control-plane-mcp alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a codex-control-plane-mcp alternative? If you're comparing codex-control-plane-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • DashClaw by ucsandman · ⭐ 306

    Remote approvals, policy checks, and execution evidence for unattended AI agents.

  • sub-agents-mcp by shinpr · ⭐ 98

    Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.

  • Commonly-used-high-value-skills by seaworld008 · ⭐ 70

    High-value AI skills repository for Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, agents, prompts, and automation workflows.

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 518

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • kindly-web-search-mcp-server by Shelpuk-AI-Technology-Consulting · ⭐ 388

    Kindly Web Search MCP Server: Web search + robust content retrieval for AI coding tools (Claude Code, Codex, C

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is codex-control-plane-mcp?

codex-control-plane-mcp is Durable MCP control plane for long-running Codex Desktop tasks. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 122 GitHub stars.

What programming language is codex-control-plane-mcp written in?

codex-control-plane-mcp is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent-tools, agentic-workflows, ai-agents.

How do I install or use codex-control-plane-mcp?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the codex-control-plane-mcp GitHub repository at github.com/aresyn/codex-control-plane-mcp. The project has 122 stars and 4 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does codex-control-plane-mcp use?

codex-control-plane-mcp is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to codex-control-plane-mcp?

The top alternatives to codex-control-plane-mcp on Agent Skills Hub include DashClaw, sub-agents-mcp, Commonly-used-high-value-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools