by armpro24-blip · MCP Server · ★ 83
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 83 |
| Forks | 20 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 9 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-31 |
| Created | 2026-05-26 |
| Platforms | mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
CAD/CAE Copilot Most AI CAD tools stop when a picture appears. CAD/CAE Copilot turns an engineering spec into real, editable, verifiable CAD — and keeps every artifact reproducible. An AI-native CAD/CAE/CAX workbench.
These tools work well together with cad-cae-copilot for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a cad-cae-copilot alternative? If you're comparing cad-cae-copilot with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Maintenance mode: bug fixes only, no new features. Lighter option, no app to install: forgent3d/forgent3d-skil
Using AI to generate 3D models
AutoCAD MCP server for AI agents (Claude, Cursor, any MCP client): 240+ tools to draw, edit and read DWG/DXF d
Open-source NURBS surface modeller — a Rhino-style freeform modeller on the OpenCASCADE kernel, with AI-native
CAD CLI and MCP server for AI agents
Exact B-Rep CAD in TypeScript, with a Claude Code plugin that lets agents write parts and check them on OpenCa
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: