by blwfish · MCP Server · ★ 63
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 63 |
| Forks | 12 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | LGPL-2.1 |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-02 |
| Created | 2026-02-20 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
freecad-mcp What This Does This is a bridge between your AI agent and FreeCAD — a thinking partner for parametric design, CNC toolpath generation, and mesh work. You bring the design intent and the domain judgment; the agent handles the FreeCAD mechanics.
Looking for a freecad-mcp alternative? If you're comparing freecad-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Python MCP server for SolidWorks: lets Claude and other AI agents build parts, assemblies and drawings through
MCP Server for SketchUp
The FreeCAD Robust MCP server and MCP Bridge Workbench/Addon
CAD CLI and MCP server for AI agents
MCP server for build123d to improve AI cognition when creating 3D CAD models
CAD/CAE Copilot — an AI-native CAD/CAE/CAX workbench for AI agents. Text-to-CAD, text-to-CAE, real build123d/O
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: