by asinghcsu · Agent Tool · ★ 1.7k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,734 |
| Forks | 185 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 50/100 |
| Last Updated | 2025-10-20 |
| Created | 2025-01-10 |
| Est. Tokens | ~1201k |
Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation : A Survey On Agentic RAG Overview of Agentic RAG Recent Update (2025-02-04): Check section 4 in the table of contents in this repo for the new Agentic Workflow Patterns. New images have been added to enhance the Overview of Agentic RAG. The paper is also updated.
Looking for a AgenticRAG-Survey alternative? If you're comparing AgenticRAG-Survey with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Nexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering princi
🤖 A comprehensive list of 1,500+ resources and tools related to AI agents.
RAGLight is a modular framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). It makes it easy to plug in differen
Practical system design, tools, and hands-on resources for building Gen-AI agents & agentic AI systems.
Hands-on tutorials for building AI agents from scratch. Learn LLM APIs, prompt engineering, tool calling, and
Harness LLMs with Multi-Agent Programming
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: