by atharvnaik1 · MCP Server · ★ 102
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 43 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 102 |
| Forks | 89 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Open Issues | 45 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-25 |
| Created | 2026-03-19 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~804k |
ipaShip - Mobile Apps Compliance Auditor (Open Source) AI-powered iOS App Store compliance auditor. Upload your file and get a comprehensive audit against Apple's Review Guidelines — before you submit. Added kimi 2.5 as default with my own api key.
These tools work well together with ipaship-audit for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ipaship-audit alternative? If you're comparing ipaship-audit with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
CodeWhisper: AI-Powered End-to-End Task Implementation & blazingly fast Codebase-to-LLM Context Bridge
Transform your Claude Code terminal with atomic precision statusline. Features flexible layouts, real-time cos
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
AEO Automation Framework for Claude Code One-click, beginner friendly automation for GitHub. Includes a dedica
AI-powered E2E testing for 10 platforms. 253 MCP tools. Zero config. Works with Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Copi
Lightweight Claude Code statusLine: 5h/7d rate-limit usage, reset countdowns, model + context window, prompt-c
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 43 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: