iam-policy-autopilot — security grade SAFE, quality 69/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 69/100

Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by awslabs · MCP Server · ★ 456

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is iam-policy-autopilot safe to install? View the security audit →

About iam-policy-autopilot

IAM Policy Autopilot An open source Model Context Protocol (MCP) server and command-line tool that helps your AI coding assistants quickly create baseline IAM policies that you can refine as your application evolves, so you can build faster. IAM Policy Autopilot analyzes your application code locally to generate identity-based policies for application roles, enabling faster IAM policy creation and reducing access troubleshooting time. IAM Policy Autopilot supports applications built in Python, Go, and TypeScript. We want to hear from you. Ask questions or share ideas in Discussions, report bugs through Issues, or contribute directly with a Pull Request. Table of Contents Who is IAM Policy Autopilot for? [How is

awsaws-iamaws-iam-policiesaws-securityclicloud-securitycode-analysisiamiam-policymcp

Quick Facts

Stars456
Forks53
LanguageRust
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score69.4377850268335/100
Open Issues35
Last Updated2026-09-21
Created2025-10-15
Platformsaws, cli, mcp, rust
Est. Tokens~26k

iam-policy-autopilot alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a iam-policy-autopilot alternative? If you're comparing iam-policy-autopilot with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • roam-code by Cranot · ⭐ 518

    Local codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 287 comman

  • ai-trader by whchien · ⭐ 1.1k

    Backtrader-powered backtesting framework for algorithmic trading, featuring 20+ strategies, multi-market suppo

  • agentic-radar by splx-ai · ⭐ 1.1k

    A security scanner for your LLM agentic workflows

  • cupertino by mihaelamj · ⭐ 841

    A local Apple Documentation crawler and MCP server. Written in Swift.

  • Wax by christopherkarani · ⭐ 799

    Shared Single-file memory layer for all your agents, sub mili-second RAG over text, photo and video on Apple S

  • drift by dadbodgeoff · ⭐ 785

    Codebase intelligence for AI. Detects patterns & conventions + remembers decisions across sessions. MCP server

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Rust Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is iam-policy-autopilot?

iam-policy-autopilot is IAM Policy Autopilot is an open source static code analysis tool that helps you quickly create baseline AWS IAM policies that you can refine as your application evolves. This tool is available as a co. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 456 GitHub stars.

What programming language is iam-policy-autopilot written in?

iam-policy-autopilot is primarily written in Rust. It covers topics such as aws, aws-iam, aws-iam-policies.

How do I install or use iam-policy-autopilot?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the iam-policy-autopilot GitHub repository at github.com/awslabs/iam-policy-autopilot. The project has 456 stars and 53 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does iam-policy-autopilot use?

iam-policy-autopilot is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to iam-policy-autopilot?

The top alternatives to iam-policy-autopilot on Agent Skills Hub include roam-code, ai-trader, agentic-radar. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools