by balavenkatesh3322 · Agent Tool · ★ 209
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 209 |
| Forks | 42 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 52/100 |
| Open Issues | 9 |
| Last Updated | 2025-08-26 |
| Created | 2025-08-19 |
| Est. Tokens | ~285k |
Awesome Open-Source AI Toolkit Stop searching. This is the only AI toolkit a developer will ever need! This toolkit covers all areas of AI, from machine learning basics to specialized fields like computer vision, NLP, reinforcement learning, and MLOps. Updated with 2025 trends for building, learning, and experimenting efficiently.
Looking for a awesome-AI-toolkit alternative? If you're comparing awesome-AI-toolkit with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🌟 A curated collection of free, high quality AI tools 🤖, APIs 🔗, datasets 📊, and learning resources 📚 cov
Curated list of free and low cost AI tools, LLM APIs, IDEs, agents, and infrastructure for building real AI ap
🤖 Automatically collected AI repos, tools, websites, papers & tutorials. 实用AI百宝箱 💎
A curated list of best ai tools
AI tools curated by autonomous AI agents for makers and SMBs
Giselle: AI App Builder. Open Source.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: