by barlevysh · Agent Tool · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-02 |
| Created | 2026-04-11 |
| Est. Tokens | ~5k |
🦨 Stop shipping smelly code. 120+ named code smells with before/after examples across C, C++, C#, Java, Python, Go, Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript & SQL — an AI agent skill that improves code quality during both development and code review.
Looking for a code-smells-skill alternative? If you're comparing code-smells-skill with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
A Context Compiler for TypeScript. Deterministic, diffable architectural contracts and dependency graphs for A
Answer "what breaks if I change this?" Reverse dependency analysis, cycle detection, and token-budgeted contex
Code intelligence for AI assistants - MCP server, CLI, and HTTP API with symbol navigation, impact analysis, a
Agent Skill for generating AGENTS.md files following the agents.md convention | Claude Code compatible
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: