by behzade · Codex Skill · ★ 67
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 67 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | GPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2026-08-29 |
| Platforms | cli, codex, rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
Farcaster Farcaster is a native, keyboard-first workspace for running and coordinating coding agents across harnesses, with an embedded terminal and Neovim. Why The agent space is changing fast, but switching harnesses shouldn't mean relearning the interface or leaving your editor behind.
Looking for a farcaster alternative? If you're comparing farcaster with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Neovim plugin that shows a live diff preview of AI coding agent's file edits before you accept or reject the
Agent control panel for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Pi and 40+ agents with articles and boards supported
Native terminal multiplexer for coding agents. Persistent sessions, Git worktrees, diffs, and an integrated ed
Your agents. Your workspace. Your control—from prompt to commit, desktop to mobile. Works with Codex, Claude C
⚡ Stream browser logs to terminal, zero setup, perfect for Ai Agents
Ultra-fast token & cost tracker for LLM Token Usage (e.g. Claude Code)
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: