Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 17 |
| Forks | 6 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-09-22 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
JEV-powered market decision bot for stocks, crypto and memes. State in, BUY/SELL/HOLD/AVOID out, paper by default
Looking for a jev-bot alternative? If you're comparing jev-bot with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
MCP server that captures TradingView chart images via Selenium — supports any ticker/interval with browser poo
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev
CCXT MCP Server bridges the gap between AI models and cryptocurrency trading by providing a standardized inter
Free crypto news API - real-time aggregator for Bitcoin, Ethereum, DeFi, Solana & altcoins. No API key require
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: