browser: The fastest, most token-efficient way for AI agents to control Chrome

by camhahu · Agent Tool · ★ 167

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 74/100

Flagged: sudo usage. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars167
Forks17
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score74/100
Open Issues5
Last Updated2026-03-18
Created2025-12-23
Platformsbrowser, node
Est. Tokens~15k

About browser

browser The fastest, most token-efficient way for AI agents to control Chrome. Benchmarks in progress: Early testing shows 3x faster than agent-browser for a variety of usecases, but does not yet support as wide of a feature set. Experimental: Commands are stable, but their output format is subject to change as we optimize for AI agent effectiveness. Platform Support: Confirmed working on macOS.

browser alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a browser alternative? If you're comparing browser with other agent tool tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-plugins by Kamalnrf · ⭐ 564

    Lightweight registry to discover, install, and manage all public Claude plugins and agent skills for your favo

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools