by ccsert · Agent Tool · ★ 75
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 75 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-19 |
| Created | 2026-01-28 |
| Platforms | docker, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
OpenCode Gitea Review 中文文档 | English An AI-powered automatic code review tool for Gitea/Forgejo PRs, built on the OpenCode plugin system. It listens for PR and comment events via Gitea Actions, automatically fetches code diffs, and submits structured reviews.
Looking for a opencode-review-gitea alternative? If you're comparing opencode-review-gitea with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Kelos - The Kubernetes-native framework for orchestrating autonomous AI coding agents.
CodeWhisper: AI-Powered End-to-End Task Implementation & blazingly fast Codebase-to-LLM Context Bridge
use claude code's agent teams orchestraction with any harness
Multi-agent orchestration extension for Gemini CLI — 22 specialists, parallel subagents, persistent sessions,
Bitbucket CLI with gh-like ergonomics
Universal development automation for ANY project. Claude Code implements features, runs tests, creates PRs aut
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: