by chuspeeism · AI Tool · ★ 111
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 111 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 40/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-27 |
| Created | 2026-09-26 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~28k |
Awesome Opus 5.5 Videos 访问我们的官网 → img.dsxzai.com 在官网浏览 Opus 5.5 视频与 Image2.5 图片案例，按添加日期查看新作品、筛选分类并查看提示词。 收录 300 个 Claude Opus 5.5 视频案例，按用途分类。保留作者、X 原帖、作品说明及公开提示词。 全部视频均可在本 README 内播放。 视频默认展示，点击播放即可观看；长视频按编号分段，保留完整内容。 浏览案例网站 · 结构化案例数据 这些案例主要展示 Opus 5.5 编写动画、渲染或剪辑代码的能力。视频归属及具体制作方式以发布者的原帖说明为准。 分类 动效与片头 镜头演变的未来感动效 · @sachingmt 发布者：@sachingmt · X 原帖 · 提示词与制作说明 作者用一句提示词让 Opus 5.5...
Looking for a awesome-opus-5-5-videos alternative? If you're comparing awesome-opus-5-5-videos with other ai tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: