by cloudcommunity · Agent Tool · ★ 84
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
A curated list of artificial intelligence (AI) tools.
| Stars | 84 |
| Forks | 15 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 57.7594657109537/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2025-02-19 |
| Created | 2023-10-15 |
| Est. Tokens | ~1k |
Looking for a AI-Tools alternative? If you're comparing AI-Tools with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
User friendly CLI tool for AI tasks. Stop thinking about LLMs and prompts, start getting results!
Dory treats hosted LLM interfaces as disposable tools by offloading state to your local environment and enforc
🌍 The open-source Wikipedia of AI — 2M+ apps, agents, LLMs & datasets. Updated daily with tools, tutorials &
Practical techniques for coding with ai assistants (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, etc). Avai
Curiso is an infinite canvas for your thoughts
MCPSDK.dev(ToolSDK.ai)'s Awesome MCP Servers and Packages Registry and Database with Structured JSON configura
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
AI-Tools is A curated list of artificial intelligence (AI) tools.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 84 GitHub stars.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the AI-Tools GitHub repository at github.com/cloudcommunity/AI-Tools. The project has 84 stars and 15 forks, indicating an active community.
AI-Tools is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to AI-Tools on Agent Skills Hub include cai, dory, inAI-wiki. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: