interactive-brokers-mcp: Interactive Brokers MCP Server

by code-rabi · MCP Server · ★ 227

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

ibkribkr-apiinteractive-brokersmcpmcp-server

Quick Facts

Stars227
Forks49
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score73/100
Open Issues8
Last Updated2026-07-21
Created2025-08-15
Platformsmcp, node
Est. Tokens~15k

About interactive-brokers-mcp

Interactive Brokers MCP Server DISCLAIMER: This is an unofficial, community-developed MCP server and is NOT affiliated with or endorsed by Interactive Brokers. This software is in Alpha state and may not work perfectly. A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides integration with Interactive Brokers' trading platform.

interactive-brokers-mcp alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a interactive-brokers-mcp alternative? If you're comparing interactive-brokers-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • Trading-Journal-AI by simonro · ⭐ 97

    Local-first AI trading journal. Import your broker CSV, get round-trip trades, KPIs and Claude-powered diary a

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools