by codician-team · MCP Server · ★ 82
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 82 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-06 |
| Created | 2026-10-25 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
Diffinery The open-source GitHub and GitHub Actions alternative that runs entirely on Cloudflare. Git hosting, pull requests, code review and drop-in GitHub Actions CI, with agent tasks, agent code review and plugins for Claude Code and Codex, built for teams of people and AI agents. Deploy it to your own Cloudflare account: no servers, no runner machines, nothing to patch.
These tools work well together with diffinery for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a diffinery alternative? If you're comparing diffinery with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Source for Swarm Verify: run project checks, record verifiable evidence, and expose verification gaps in AI-wr
Skills from StarSling (agent-native CI)
Production-grade GitLab MCP server with 86 tools — full GitLab control from any AI agent (Claude, Cursor, Zed)
The AI control plane for every agent in your enterprise, built around an enterprise-grade MCP gateway. Give ea
Bitbucket CLI with gh-like ergonomics
A Git MCP server for AI agents. STDIO & Streamable HTTP.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: