No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by moonrunnerkc · Agent Tool · ★ 106
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is swarm-orchestrator safe to install? View the security audit →
Swarm Orchestrator Reads a pull request (PR) diff and flags the shortcuts artificial intelligence (AI) coding agents use to look done without being done. Relaxed tests, swallowed errors, fake renames, eleven categories in all. Grading patches against typed obligation contracts via a multi-persona pipeline is the second surface. For engineers reviewing AI-written PRs at volume. Compliance teams generate CycloneDX-ML (machine learning) and SPDX (Software Package Data Exchange) 3.0 AI-BOM (bill of materials) artifacts. The artifacts map to EU AI Act (European Union Artificial Intelligence Act) Annex IV and CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) reporting. Maintainers keep a hash-chained evidence record for every graded patch. Flags are tips, blocks are proof. A flag is a structural detector seeing a cheat-shaped pattern; it is advisory and never blocks a merge ( is the default). A block is a self-certifying runtime result whose per-instance controls are all green, and every block ships the exact command that reproduces it in a fresh checkout. Eight proof protocols back the gate today: six execution-grounded restoration proofs (, , , , , ) plus and .
| Stars | 106 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | ISC |
| Quality Score | 70.2578815380107/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-03 |
| Created | 2026-01-22 |
| Platforms | cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
These tools work well together with swarm-orchestrator for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a swarm-orchestrator alternative? If you're comparing swarm-orchestrator with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
A memory-first AI agent that remembers why decisions were made — not just the last message. Runs local (Ollama
AGI-oriented, hallucination-resistant AI coding runtime grounded in evidence, tools, memory, agents, and verif
An example agent demonstrating streaming, tool use, and interactivity from your terminal. This agent builder c
Build, Improve Performance, and Productionize your LLM Application with an Integrated Framework
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
swarm-orchestrator is A coding agent whose claims about its own work resolve to machine-captured evidence: an append-only hash-chained ledger, gates that retry under a numeric ratchet, and a signed bundle carrying its own . It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 106 GitHub stars.
swarm-orchestrator is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as agentic-ai, ai-agents, anthropic.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the swarm-orchestrator GitHub repository at github.com/moonrunnerkc/swarm-orchestrator. The project has 106 stars and 5 forks, indicating an active community.
swarm-orchestrator is released under the ISC license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to swarm-orchestrator on Agent Skills Hub include captain-claw, tokentop, zeph. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: