by cosyncing · Codex Skill · ★ 59
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install --global cosyncingTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 59 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-26 |
| Created | 2026-08-07 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
From CLI to GUI, live and in sync Website · Install · Client · Docs · Contributing · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어</a
Looking for a cosyncing alternative? If you're comparing cosyncing with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source canvas for orchestrating Claude Code, Codex, and other CLI agents. Run agents in parallel, delegat
Open-source Agentic Development Environment (ADE) for Codex, Claude Code and other agents. Run on your own Win
Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.
Run your coding agents from Telegram. A bridge for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and Pi: send tasks by text or
Your agents. Your workspace. Your control—from prompt to commit, desktop to mobile. Works with Codex, Claude C
Podium is an ADE with built-in cross-harness subagents and agent communication. It runs on desktop, mobile and
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: