Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/crabin/paper-humanizer-skill.git /tmp/paper-humanizer-skillTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 124 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 57/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-28 |
| Created | 2026-01-19 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~4k |
Paper Humanizer Skill 中英文学术文本润色与人性化Skill，用于去除 AI 生成的痕迹，同时严格保持事实准确性。 ✨ 主要功能 🎯 去除 AI 痕迹：识别并移除常见的 AI 写作模式 📚 学术语气优化：保持学术严谨性，提升文本自然度 🔒 事实严格保护：绝不编造数据、篡改数值或改变实验结论 🌍 双语支持：完整支持中文和英文学术写作 ⚙️ 高度可配置：多种参数配置，适应不同写作风格 🚀 快速开始 作为 Claude Code Skill 使用 安装步骤 使用 在对话中直接使用，系统会自动应用相应的提示词。 命令行脚本使用 📋 参数配置 基础参数 约束控制
Looking for a paper-humanizer-skill alternative? If you're comparing paper-humanizer-skill with other ai tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: