No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by crisnahine · MCP Server · ★ 158
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is rails-ai-context safe to install? View the security audit →
rails-ai-context Your AI is guessing your Rails app. Every guess costs you time. [ server
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
Jetpack Compose Agent Skill — AI-powered coding guidance with actual androidx/androidx source code receipts. W
Postman MCP Server — connect AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code Copilot, Gemini CLI) to your Postman coll
ToolHive is an application that allows you to install, manage and run MCP servers and connect them to AI agent
Rails Engine with MCP compliant Spec.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
rails-ai-context is 45 MCP tools that give AI coding agents ground truth about your Rails app: schema, models, routes, controllers, views, jobs, conventions. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and C. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 158 GitHub stars.
rails-ai-context is primarily written in Ruby. It covers topics such as ai, ai-coding, claude.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the rails-ai-context GitHub repository at github.com/crisnahine/rails-ai-context. The project has 158 stars and 13 forks, indicating an active community.
rails-ai-context is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to rails-ai-context on Agent Skills Hub include Overture, agnix, compose-skill. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: