by nagstler · MCP Server · ★ 97
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 97 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Ruby |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 77/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-05 |
| Created | 2025-04-14 |
| Platforms | mcp, ruby |
| Est. Tokens | ~13k |
MCP on Ruby Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Rails applications Expose your Rails app as an AI accessible interface — define tools and resources the Rails way. Features 🚀 Production-Ready - Authentication, rate limiting, error handling, security 🔧 Rails Integration - Generators, autoloading, middleware, Railtie 🛠️ Tools System - Callable functions with JSON Schema validation 📊...
These tools work well together with mcp_on_ruby for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a mcp_on_ruby alternative? If you're comparing mcp_on_ruby with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Stop AI from guessing your Rails app. 35 MCP tools give coding agents ground truth on demand: schema, models,
Govern & Secure your AI
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code
🤖 Taskade MCP · Official MCP server and OpenAPI to MCP codegen. Build AI agent tools from any OpenAPI API and
Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server to connect your AI with any MediaWiki
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: