Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/cth9191/taste-vault.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 105 |
| Forks | 14 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-09 |
| Created | 2026-07-24 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Taste Vault Inspiration in, vocabulary out. A local, zero-build design-taste gallery that turns screenshots of sites you love into objective design vocabulary, clustered collections, and paste-ready briefs for Codex, Claude Code and other coding assistants. Built as the companion tool for the video Turn Claude Into A Design GENIUS In 3 Simple Steps.
Looking for a taste-vault alternative? If you're comparing taste-vault with other ai tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: