by dan6684 · MCP Server · ★ 11
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 11 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 76/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2025-10-26 |
| Created | 2025-10-26 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~4k |
MCP server that exposes Obsidian Smart Connections vector database to Claude Code via semantic search
Looking for a smart-connections-mcp alternative? If you're comparing smart-connections-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Efficient multi-strategy Zotero search using code execution pattern
Give Claude semantic memory of your Obsidian vault — local semantic search over Smart Connections embeddings v
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
编程导航 2025 年 AI 开发实战新项目，基于 Spring Boot 3 + Java 21 + Spring AI 构建 AI 恋爱大师应用和 ReAct 模式自主规划智能体YuManus，覆盖 AI 大模型接入
🧠 High-performance persistent memory system for Model Context Protocol (MCP) powered by libSQL. Features vect
A Telegram bot that proves you don't need a body to have a personality. Works with any OpenAI-compatible LLM;
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: