by danielsogl · MCP Server · ★ 74
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 74 |
| Forks | 13 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 7 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-02 |
| Created | 2025-06-01 |
| Platforms | browser, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
Lighthouse MCP Server A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive web performance auditing and analysis capabilities using Google Lighthouse. This server enables LLMs and AI agents to perform detailed website performance assessments, accessibility audits, SEO analysis, security checks, and Core Web Vitals monitoring.
Looking for a lighthouse-mcp-server alternative? If you're comparing lighthouse-mcp-server with other mcp server tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MCP server for Google PageSpeed Insights & Chrome UX Report APIs. Analyze, compare, and optimize web performan
"ULTRASHIP" Claude Code plugin — 39 skills, 33 tools, 11 agents for ship-ready workflows: planning, review, pe
Allows AI assistants such as Amp/Cline/Cursor/Claude Code/Codex/GitHub Copilot to use Google's lighthouse tool
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: