by priyankark · MCP Server · ★ 216
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx lighthouse-mcp
npm install -g lighthouse-mcpTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 216 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 77/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-03 |
| Created | 2025-04-07 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, cli, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Lighthouse MCP Server An MCP server that wraps around Google's Lighthouse tool to help measure various performance metrics for web pages. Features Run comprehensive Lighthouse audits on any URL Get performance scores and metrics Configure device emulation (mobile/desktop) Control network throttling Select specific audit categories Installation Option 1: From MCP Registry (Recommended) This server...
Looking for a lighthouse-mcp alternative? If you're comparing lighthouse-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
"ULTRASHIP" Claude Code plugin — 39 skills, 33 tools, 11 agents for ship-ready workflows: planning, review, pe
MCP server for Google PageSpeed Insights & Chrome UX Report APIs. Analyze, compare, and optimize web performan
MCP server that enables AI agents to perform comprehensive web audits using Google Lighthouse with 13+ tools f
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: