by decodingai-magazine · Agent Tool · ★ 33
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 33 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-18 |
| Created | 2026-08-29 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Learn to design an LLM wiki from first principles. Used as agent memory. Workshop with 3 exercises, open-source code, video, and slides. No coding skills required.
Looking for a llm-wiki-workshop alternative? If you're comparing llm-wiki-workshop with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Memory for AI that works like yours—local, instant, persistent. 13x faster than Pinecone, 5x leaner than RAG.
Agent skills for Spec Kit
172 expert marketing skills for AI agents — ClawFu MCP Server
Deterministic research MCP server on FastMCP 3 — 5-engine web search, 9-platform social search, 6 academic DBs
Quarkus LangChain4J Workshop that demonstrates both single AI service capabilities and Agentic AI orchestratio
Curated list of Agent Skills for AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex and Cursor.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: