AI4S-agent-tools — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by deepmodeling · Agent Tool · ★ 88

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is AI4S-agent-tools safe to install? View the security audit →

About AI4S-agent-tools

AI4S-agent-tools An open project by the DeepModeling community - Building intelligent tools for scientific research. 🌐 View Tool Showcase | 🤝 Contribute | 🎯 Mission We're building a comprehensive "scientific capability library" - agent-ready tools that cover the full spectrum of AI for Science tasks: 🔬 Current Tools Materials Science DPACalculator - Deep learning atomistic simulations with universal potentials Thermoelectric - Materials screening with CALYPSO ABACUS-tools - First-principles calculations with ABACUS Chemistry PubChem - Compound data retrieval and structure download Catalysis - Reaction calculations with ADSEC workflow Research Tools Paper Search - ArXiv literature search and parsing DeepMD Docs RAG - Documentation knowledge base 🚀 Coming Soon 📊 Spectral analysis (XRD, NMR, Raman) 🧬 Protein structure prediction 🔭 3D molecular visualization 📈 Experimental design optimization 🧫 Multi-objective Bayesian optimization 💻 Quick Start Use a Tool Add Your Tool bash Copy template cp -r servers/e

Quick Facts

Stars88
Forks28
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score66.2107353004211/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-04-09
Created2025-05-26
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~4727k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with AI4S-agent-tools for enhanced workflows:

  • Claude-meta-skill — semantic(0.25)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (54%)
  • flyto-core — semantic(0.23)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (53%)
  • MagicSkills — semantic(0.19)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (52%)
  • MLLM-Tool — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)

AI4S-agent-tools alternative? Top 2 similar tools

Looking for a AI4S-agent-tools alternative? If you're comparing AI4S-agent-tools with other agent tool tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • tutor-skills by RoundTable02 · ⭐ 400

    A Claude Code skill that turns PDFs, docs, and codebases into Obsidian study vaults

  • repren by jlevy · ⭐ 374

    Power rename/refactor tool for CLI and agent use

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is AI4S-agent-tools?

AI4S-agent-tools is Collecting a variety of Agent-Ready tool modules. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 88 GitHub stars.

What programming language is AI4S-agent-tools written in?

AI4S-agent-tools is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use AI4S-agent-tools?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the AI4S-agent-tools GitHub repository at github.com/deepmodeling/AI4S-agent-tools. The project has 88 stars and 28 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does AI4S-agent-tools use?

AI4S-agent-tools is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to AI4S-agent-tools?

The top alternatives to AI4S-agent-tools on Agent Skills Hub include tutor-skills, repren. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools