jev-review — security grade SAFE, quality 71/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 71/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by devagrawal09 · AI Tool · ★ 674

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jev-review safe to install? View the security audit →

About jev-review

Jev Review A small code-review workflow built with TypeSafe Jev. It can review a Git diff or scan a complete codebase, follows the strongest structured signals through focused model calls, and presents the result in a quiet local dashboard. How It Works The reviewer keeps orchestration in code and uses Jev for bounded judgments: Exposes separate change-review and complete-codebase entry points. Uses changed or related tests as context when judging test gaps. Screens correctness, security, reliability, compatibility, and test coverage. Selects concrete diff hunks or source regions before scoring impact. Uses structured hints, counterexamples, and explicit decision boundaries. Applies thresholds and workflow policy in code. Shows large reports in collapsible dashboard sections. Binds the dashboard to and never serves environment files. Quick Start Requires Node.js 24+, Git, and a TypeSafe API key. bash npm install cp .env.example .env Add TYPESAFEAPIKEY to .env Review the current Git diff npm run review:changes:save -- /path/to/git/repository Or scan every non-ignored source file under a scope npm run review:codebase:save

aicode-reviewjevtypesafe-aitypescript

Quick Facts

Stars674
Forks43
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAI Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score71.1525143906029/100
Open Issues7
Last Updated2026-09-17
Created2026-09-16
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~12k

jev-review alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a jev-review alternative? If you're comparing jev-review with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • neurolink by juspay · ⭐ 143

    The pipe layer of an AI nervous system — one interface connecting provider neurons to your application, across

  • awesome-jev-by-typesafe by Anil-matcha · ⭐ 902

    Evidence-backed use cases, patterns, prompts, and starter code for TypeSafe Jev — a System One model for fast,

  • jev-review by NiazMorshed2007 · ⭐ 234

    Local-first MCP plugin for continuous software-quality review by AI coding agents, powered by Jev.

  • ai-reviewer by presubmit · ⭐ 187

    Context-aware AI reviewer for Pull Requests. Instant summary, line-by-line comments, title generation and more

  • shadcn-ui-mcp-server by Jpisnice · ⭐ 3.0k

    A mcp server to allow LLMS gain context about shadcn ui component structure,usage and installation,compaitable

  • gemini-mcp-tool by jamubc · ⭐ 2.3k

    MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Google Gemini CLI, leveraging Gemini's massive token wi

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jev-review?

jev-review is A staged code-review workflow and local dashboard built with TypeSafe Jev.. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 674 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jev-review written in?

jev-review is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai, code-review, jev.

How do I install or use jev-review?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jev-review GitHub repository at github.com/devagrawal09/jev-review. The project has 674 stars and 43 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does jev-review use?

jev-review is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to jev-review?

The top alternatives to jev-review on Agent Skills Hub include neurolink, awesome-jev-by-typesafe, jev-review. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools