by disconnect13 · MCP Server · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-22 |
| Created | 2026-04-11 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~12k |
⚡ Real-time token, context & agent dashboard for Claude Code — zero polling, pure stdin
Looking for a claude-code-statusline alternative? If you're comparing claude-code-statusline with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. Built for senior ICs and tech leads who already know
Claude Code hooks that auto-switch model tier based on task complexity
Advanced Claude Code framework: 40+ skills, meta-commands, TOON format (30-60% token savings), workflow automa
Claude Code statusline plugin for 5-hour/7-day quota, context usage, tokens, and reset countdowns in your term
Complete Claude Code plugin marketplace — agents, skills, hooks, commands, rules, MCPs.
A curated collection of awesome plugins for Claude Code by awesomejun
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: