by dixon2004 · Agent Tool · ★ 9
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Last Updated | 2025-08-31 |
| Created | 2025-05-15 |
| Platforms | gemini, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~2k |
AI Humanizer is a free, open-source tool that rewrites AI-generated text to sound more natural, fluent, and human.
Looking for a ai-humanizer alternative? If you're comparing ai-humanizer with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI humanizer skill for Claude Code, Codex and Cursor. Removes AI slop and the signs of AI writing, then measur
Your SDK solves all of this. One interface. Unified logic. Local + hosted models. Fine-tuning. Agent tools. En
Comprehensive guide to AI applications in OSINT workflows and intelligence analysis
Cutting-edge AI solution for Home Assistant. Multi-LLM provider support to transform your smart home experienc
Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra
Free, 100% client-side tool to remove Google Gemini and Veo 3 AI watermarks from images and videos using mathe
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: