cu-Jev: cuda-Jev — a CUDA-native Jev System One decision inference engine

by dtunai · Agent Tool · ★ 5

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: CAUTION · quality 68/100

Flagged: environment access. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

cudajevjev-model

Quick Facts

Stars5
Forks0
LanguageC
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score68/100
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2026-09-20
Est. Tokens~18k

About cu-Jev

cuda-Jev — a CUDA-native Jev System One decision inference engine. Jev compatible API, examples, and reproducible benchmarks.

cu-Jev alternative? Top 4 similar tools

Looking for a cu-Jev alternative? If you're comparing cu-Jev with other agent tool tools, these 4 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • LLMinator by Aesthisia · ⭐ 98

    Gradio based tool to run opensource LLM models directly from Huggingface

  • open-jet by L-Forster · ⭐ 92

    An offline coding agent for local models. One command sets up the best model your GPU can run, and on 24 GB+ R

  • ingero by ingero-io · ⭐ 84

    eBPF agent and MCP server for GPU causal observability

  • Canny by qkal · ⭐ 50

    Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular C Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools