by dzhng · Agent Tool · ★ 518
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 518 |
| Forks | 53 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2024-05-07 |
| Created | 2024-03-16 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~79k |
DeepSeek This is a new experimental architecture for a llm powered internet scale retrieval engine. This architecture is very different from current research agents, which are designed as answer engines.
Looking for a deep-seek alternative? If you're comparing deep-seek with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.
Agent samples built using the Strands Agents SDK.
ARGO is an open-source AI Agent platform that brings Local Manus to your desktop. With one-click model downloa
An example agent demonstrating streaming, tool use, and interactivity from your terminal. This agent builder c
This MCP server provides documentation about Strands Agents to your GenAI tools, so you can use your favorite
A desktop MCP client designed as a tool unitary utility integration, accelerating AI adoption through the Mode
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: