vidmuse-video-creator — security grade SAFE, quality 61/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 61/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by erduo1998-cell · Agent Tool · ★ 36

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is vidmuse-video-creator safe to install? View the security audit →

About vidmuse-video-creator

Open-source Agent Skill for VidMuse images, videos, and SRT B-roll from first authorization to delivery

Quick Facts

Stars36
Forks3
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score61.4864017444321/100
Last Updated2026-09-08
Created2026-08-25
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~14k

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is vidmuse-video-creator?

vidmuse-video-creator is Open-source Agent Skill for VidMuse images, videos, and SRT B-roll from first authorization to delivery. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 36 GitHub stars.

What programming language is vidmuse-video-creator written in?

vidmuse-video-creator is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use vidmuse-video-creator?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the vidmuse-video-creator GitHub repository at github.com/erduo1998-cell/vidmuse-video-creator. The project has 36 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does vidmuse-video-creator use?

vidmuse-video-creator is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools